I don’t know anything about bourbon. At all. I don’t like
the taste, I don’t like the smell. And I’ve never used it for cooking… until
now. As you know yesterday was Easter. I hosted my very first family holiday
(New Year’s Eve is what I call a “friends holiday”). For me the traditional
Easter food is ham. And boy to I love ham. But I wanted to do something
special, something different than the normal honey glaze from the packet that
comes with the ham. In a moment of inspiration my husband suggested bourbon. Sure,
why not. I don’t even know if we have it in the house but I’ll go get some and
look up recipes. I soon found myself standing in the liquor store in the
bourbon/whiskey isle with no idea what I was looking at other than price. Which
is exactly how I ended up choosing the bottle I did. I was actually a little
skittish about the particular bottle I chose because there was no information
on the back. No history of the distillery or the “distinct notes of whatever” I
was supposed to be able to taste, just a line drawn picture of what I can only
assume is supposed to be Thomas Jefferson, but with no information I can’t be
sure because it certainly doesn’t look like him. Maybe it was some other
Jefferson, possibly the 1st owner. I’ll have to do some research for
you. I decided to take a chance on this unknown bottle of bourbon. It was a
mid-range price, about $25 for a 750 mL bottle, which was actually on sale. It
had been $30 something. Jefferson Straight Bourbon Wisky (I did spell that
right I promise, that’s what’s on the bottle). It turns out my method of
choosing Bourbon was pretty awesome.
We decided to try it before cooking with
it, following our rule of “try it before you mix it”. It was surprisingly
smooth. The only other bourbon I’ve had is Jim Beam and I’ve always felt it
tasted like liquefied wood mixed with lighter fluid. Jefferson was not that at
all. It had all the heady aroma of bourbon but the alcohol burn lasted only a
second before the flavor smoothed out the a pleasingly masculine pallet. It
tasted like good cologne smells if that makes any sense.
My recipe came from Jim Beam, I felt a little like a trader
because I didn’t use Beam but it worked out. See the recipe here. The
only derivation for me was the cooking method. Instead of microwaving the honey
and molasses I decided to put the whole thing in a pot on the stove. I mixed up
the honey and molasses and let that simmer for a few minutes before adding the
orange juice, bourbon, and mustard. I let the whole thing simmer for another
minute or two before I took it off the heat and let it rest until the ham was
ready for it. The only changes I think I would make is next time I don’t think
I’ll buy a pre-sliced ham. I felt that the edges got a little dry because the
ham was not sealed together and the heat could get to the edges of the
meat. I know this will involve a little
more work on the back end but I’m ok with that. Plus I’ll be able to decide the
size of the slices when I cut it myself.
The flavor of the meat after glazing
was slightly sweet and slightly tangy with the molasses and honey being toned
down a bit by the bourbon, orange juice, and mustard. The smokey flavor of the
ham also paired really well with the rich flavor of the bourbon. I will say the
OJ was a surprise. I didn’t think about how well the acid of the OJ would work
with the ham. Usually people put pineapples but I think I’m going with orange
for that high acid note on ham from now on. My only complaint, if you can call
it one, I’d like the glaze a little thicker. I might cut down on the orange and
cook the mix a little longer to make it a little more syrupy.
I would like to note that it’s probably not the best idea to
test new recipes or new ingredients on family dinners. It is a little cruel to
use your family as test subjects for all your culinary adventures but sometimes
it works out for the best. This time I was lucky both my 1st time
recipes worked out. Come back Friday for more information about the 2nd
1st of Easter, chocolate cheesecake,
otherwise known as decadence on a plate.
No comments:
Post a Comment